Go kart set up tool

ABSTRACT

A go kart set up tool for checking a longitudinal chassis alignment of a go kart and for gauging a steering mechanism of the go kart having a first front stub axle and a second front stub axle on opposing sides of the go kart and having a rear axle, includes a tool body, a level disposed in the tool body for vertically aligning the tool body in at least one dimension, a laser emitter disposed within the tool body and adapted to emit a laser beam in a laser emission direction, with the laser emitter being aimable at a first target for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart and being aimable at a second target for gauging the steering mechanism, and an axle engagement structure. The axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on any one of the first and second front stub axles in two orientations, with the laser emitter aiming towards a rear of the go kart in a first orientation of the tool body for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment and with the laser emitter aiming towards the other one of the first and second front stub axles in a second orientation of the tool body for gauging the steering mechanism.

This application claims priority to German Patent Appln. No. 10 2015 100 595.6 filed Jan. 15, 2015, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The present invention is in the field of go karts. In particular, the present invention relates to tools used during the checking and setting up of the go kart, i.e. to tools used during the maintenance of the go kart and during the adaptation of the go kart to a particular race track. Further in particular, the present invention relates to tools relying on optical measurements.

2. Background Information

Go karts are a very basic kind of race cars. They are mainly used for recreational racing purposes. Also, go karts are used by children and adolescents who wish to enter the field of car racing. In particular, go karts are viewed as a stepping stone for developing driving skills before moving on to professional car racing classes like Formula 3®, GP 2®, and Formula 1®.

Typical go karts have a chassis, which forms the base of the go kart. In particular, the chassis forms the support for the other components of the go kart, such as the driver's seat, the engine, the steering mechanism, the wheels, the bumper frame, aerodynamic structures, etc. The correct alignment of the chassis is an important factor for a good driving behaviour of the go kart. If the chassis is bent or twisted, this can quickly lead to undesired driving characteristics of the go kart.

The driving characteristics of the go kart are further heavily influenced by the set up of the steering mechanism of the go kart. The user of the go kart has various degrees of freedom to set up the steering mechanism. The four most commonly used adjustment options are camber, toe in/out, caster, and king pin angle. Camber refers to the inclination of the front wheels with respect to their vertical orientation. Toe in/out refers to the degree of deviation of the wheel orientation from the longitudinal extension of the go kart. The wheels pointing towards the inside is referred to as toe in, whereas the wheels pointing towards the outside is referred to as toe out. In other words, toe in and toe out refer to the deviation of the rolling direction of a front wheel from the straight rolling direction, if the wheel were to roll unrestrained by the go kart. Caster refers to the rotation of the front wheel axis, to which the front wheel is mounted, and its point of suspension. In case the front wheel axis is suspended by a king pin, caster refers to the inclination of the king pin towards the front or back. While caster does not have an impact on the go kart during straight driving, it provides for a relative lifting or lowering of the wheel, when the steering is turned. This results in desired shifts in weight and force absorptions during cornering of the go kart. The inclination of the king pin towards the left or right, i.e. the inclination with respect to the imaginary connection line between the front axles of the go kart, is referred to as the king pin angle. While the camber of the steering mechanism may be affected by the king pin angle, it is possible that the king pin angle is zero and that camber is achieved in a different manner. In other words, there is not necessarily a direct relation between the king pin angle and the camber value.

As the chassis alignment and the steering mechanism set up play an important role in achieving good driving characteristics of the go kart, with the optimum being different from track to track depending on the layout, grip level, etc., a variety of tools for checking the chassis alignment and gauging the steering mechanism are in use. In recent years, optical measurement devices, often relying on laser technology, have become common place. However, no tools are available that allow for the checking of the chassis alignment and for the gauging of the steering mechanism in a satisfying manner.

Accordingly, it would be beneficial to provide an improved go kart set up tool that has low technical complexity and allows for an easy implementation of the go kart measurement operations.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Exemplary embodiments of the invention include a go kart set up tool for checking a longitudinal chassis alignment of a go kart and for gauging a steering mechanism of the go kart having a first front stub axle and a second front stub axle on opposing sides of the go kart and having a rear axle. The go kart set up tool comprises a tool body, a level disposed in the tool body for vertically aligning the tool body in at least one dimension, a laser emitter disposed within the tool body and adapted to emit a laser beam in a laser emission direction, with the laser emitter being aimable at a first target for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart and being aimable at a second target for gauging the steering mechanism, and an axle engagement structure, wherein the axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on any one of the first and second front stub axles in two orientations, with the laser emitter aiming towards a rear of the go kart in a first orientation of the tool body for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment and with the laser emitter aiming towards the other one of the first and second front stub axles in a second orientation of the tool body for gauging the steering mechanism.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention allow for the checking of the chassis alignment and for the gauging of the go kart steering mechanism with one kind of tool only. It is not necessary to have different tools for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart and for gauging the steering mechanism of the go kart. In particular, the emission of the laser beam towards the rear of the go kart allows for the checking of a correct overall chassis alignment. In particular, one or more kinds of misalignment, such as twist (up/down misalignment), crab (shift of one side towards the left/right), and bend (converging in front or back), can be measured. It is also possible that the king pin angle can be measured by the emission of the laser beam towards the rear of the go kart. The emission of the laser beam from one of the front stub axles towards the other one of the front stub axles allows for gauging one or more of the camber, toe in/out and caster parameters of the steering mechanism. It is not necessary that all of the discussed parameters can be measured with the go kart set up tool. It is also possible that the go kart set up tool allows to measure any subset of the parameters.

Further, as the design of the go kart set up tool according to the exemplary embodiment allows for the tool body to be positioned in two orientations and thus allows for the laser emitter to emit light in two different directions, the checking of the longitudinal chassis alignment and the gauging of the steering mechanism may be achieved with one laser emitter only. Having one laser emitter only allows for providing a go kart set up tool that is lighter, consumes less energy, is more reliable, and can be produced at lower cost, as compared to previous tools having two laser emitters. As compared to such prior art approaches, the present invention eliminates the need for two lasers, with one laser pointing in a transverse direction of the go kart and the other laser pointing in a longitudinal direction of the go kart. The invention provides for an axle engagement structure that allows for the tool body and thus for the laser emitter to be oriented in two different ways. In simple words, providing an axle engagement structure that allows for the go kart set up tool to aim the laser emitter in two different directions eliminates the need for go kart set up tools with two laser emitters and/or eliminates the need for two different set up tools for the functions of longitudinal chassis alignment checking and steering mechanism gauging.

The laser emitter has a fixed position with respect to the tool body. The language of the laser emitter being aimable at a first target for checking the longitudinal extension of the go kart and being aimable at a second target for gauging the steering mechanism does not mean that the laser emitter can be moved within the tool body for pointing in different directions. The tool body may have different positions with respect to the go kart and via these different positions, the laser emitter can be aimed at the first and the second target. It is the axle engagement structure that enables different engagements between the tool body and the go kart and that thus allows for different orientations of the tool body and different aiming directions of the laser emitter. The expression of the laser emitter being aimable at a first target means that the laser emitter may in operation be aimed at a first target. Analogously, the expression of the laser emitter being aimable at a second target means that the laser emitter may in operation be aimed at a second target. It is explicitly pointed out that the go kart set up tool may have exactly one laser emitter only.

The axle engagement structure may be integrally formed with the tool body or may be a separate part coupled to the tool body. With the axle engagement structure being placed on the axle, the tool body may extend upwards from the axle engagement structure and may form an upper portion of the go kart set up tool.

With the first and second front stub axle of a go kart commonly having a corresponding design, the go kart set up tool may be equally placed on the first front stub axle and the second front stub axle, with the laser emitter being aimable towards the respectively other of the first front stub axle and the second front stub axle as well as towards the rear of the go kart in two different orientations of the tool body. In this way, the steering mechanism may be measured from two sides and two different longitudinal chassis alignment measurements (left and right) may be made with the inventive kind of go kart set up tool. The two different longitudinal chassis alignment measurements may allow for a differential alignment analysis.

The first front stub axle may be the right front stub axle or the left front stub axle. Accordingly, the second front stub axle may be the left front stub axle or the right front stub axle.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention also include an alternative embodiment of a go kart set up tool for checking a longitudinal chassis alignment of a go kart and for gauging a steering mechanism of the go kart having a first front stub axle and a second front stub axle on opposing sides of the go kart and having a rear axle. The go kart set up tool comprises a tool body, a level disposed in the tool body for vertically aligning the tool body in at least one dimension, a laser emitter disposed within the tool body and adapted to emit a laser beam in a laser emission direction, with the laser emitter being aimable at a first target for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart and being aimable at a second target for gauging the steering mechanism, and an axle engagement structure, wherein the axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on the rear axle in a first orientation, with the laser emitter aiming towards a front of the go kart in the first orientation of the tool body for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment, and wherein the axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on any one of the first and second front stub axles in a second orientation, with the laser emitter aiming towards the other one of the first and second front stub axles in the second orientation of the tool body for gauging the steering mechanism.

This alternative embodiment works in an analogous manner, as compared with the embodiment above, with one exception. For the checking of the longitudinal chassis alignment, the go kart set up tool is placed on the rear axle and the laser emitter is aiming towards the front of the go kart. While this is different from the placement on a front stub axle and the laser emission towards the rear of the go kart, discussed above, both alternatives provide for the provision of a laser beam in a generally longitudinal direction of the go kart. Both alternatives are suitable for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment and determining one or more kinds of misalignment, such as twist, crab, and bend. Also, it is possible to measure the king pin angle via the laser beam in the generally longitudinal direction of the go kart. Both alternatives provide for a go kart set up tool that can be placed on the axles of the go kart in different manners and is thus able to emit a laser beam in a substantially longitudinal direction of the go kart as a result of a first kind of placement and to emit a laser beam in a substantially transverse direction of the go kart as a result of a second kind of placement. The axles of the go kart generally have a substantially transverse extension, i.e. a substantially left/right extension with respect to the go kart. It is also possible that the axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on any one of the first and second front stub axles in an orientation with the laser emitter aiming towards the rear of the go kart and, in addition, allows for the tool body to be positioned on the rear axle in an orientation with the laser emitting aiming towards the front of the go kart.

The rear axle of the go kart may be a single rear axle having first and second side portions on opposing sides of the go kart. In case the axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on the rear axle, the axle engagement structure may allow for the tool body to be positioned on any of the first and second side portions of the rear axle. In this way, the go kart set up tool may be adapted to emit the laser beam both along the left side and along the right side of the go kart. In this way, the longitudinal chassis alignment may be checked via measurements both along the left and right sides of the go kart. It is also possible that the rear axle of the go kart has a left rear axle section and a right rear axle section and that the right and left rear axle sections can rotate at different rotating speeds. In other words, the rear axle of the go kart may consist of a first rear axle and a second rear axle on opposing sides of the go kart. In that case, the axle engagement structure may allow for the tool body to be positioned on any one of the left and right rear axle sections. In this way, the go kart set up tool may also be adapted to emit the laser beam both along the left side and along the right side of the go kart, thus allowing measurements along both along the left and right sides of the go kart.

According to a further embodiment, the laser emission direction in the first orientation is rotated 90° with respect to the laser emission direction in the second orientation. In this way, laser emission towards a respective target is made possible both along the stub axle, onto which the go kart set up tool is placed, and perpendicular to the stub axle towards the rear of the go kart and/or perpendicular to the rear axle towards the front of the go kart, depending which of above described alternative embodiments is present. By covering these two measurement directions, which are angled at 90° with respect to each other, the most important chassis alignment and steering mechanism parameters can be measured. The rotation of the laser emission direction by 90° refers to the go kart frame of reference. Again, it does not mean that the laser emitter is rotated within the tool body. In case the rear axle and the front stub axles are not parallel and the tool body is positioned on the rear axle in the first orientation, the rotation may be not exactly 90°. In this case, the rotation of 90° is to be understood as a rotation of 90° plus/minus the angle between the respective front stub axle and the rear axle.

According to a further embodiment, the axle engagement structure has a first engagement element and a second engagement element, with the tool body having the first orientation, when the first engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles, and with the tool body having the second orientation, when the second engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles.

The first and second engagement elements are configured for engagement with a front stub axle. By providing two engagement elements, the go kart set up tool can be brought into engagement with the stub axle in two different ways. In particular, the two engagement elements are of such kind that they provide mutually exclusive engagement configurations with the stub axle. In other words, the two engagement elements do not merely allow for a slight re-positioning with respect to the front stub axle, such as a rotation around the front stub axle, but they allow for a significant re-positioning of the tool body and thus for a significant re-orientation of the laser emission direction. In particular, the laser emission direction in the first orientation may be angled with respect to the laser emission direction in the second orientation at an angle of at least 45°, in particular at an angle of between 80° and 100°, further in particular at an angle of about 90°. In this way, two entirely different measurements are made possible by dis-engaging the axle engagement structure from the stub axle and by re-engaging the axle engagement structure tool with the stub axle in the respectively other orientation. The first and second engagement elements may be conceptionally like elements, but may have a different orientation within the axle engagement structure. In particular, the first and second engagement elements may be rotated 90° with respect to each other.

According to an alternative embodiment, the axle engagement structure has a first engagement element and a second engagement element, with the tool body having the first orientation, when the first engagement element is in engagement with the rear axle, and with the tool body having the second orientation, when the second engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles.

The first engagement element is configured for engagement with the rear axle and the second engagement element is configured for engagement with a front stub axle. In the go kart frame of reference, the laser emission direction in the first orientation may be angled with respect to the laser emission direction in the second orientation at an angle of at least 45°, in particular at an angle of between 80° and 100°, further in particular at an angle of about 90°. In this way, two entirely different measurements are made possible by dis-engaging the axle engagement structure from the rear axle and by re-engaging the axle engagement structure tool with the front stub axle or vice versa. The first and second engagement elements may be conceptionally like elements, but may have a different orientation within the axle engagement structure. In particular, the first and second engagement elements may be rotated 90° with respect to each other. The first and second engagement elements may be adapted to different diameters of the front stub axles and the rear axle.

According to a further embodiment, the first and second engagement elements are a first engagement groove and a second engagement groove. Each of the first and second engagement grooves may be configured for engagement with any one of the first and second front stub axles. It is also possible that the first engagement groove is configured for engagement with the rear axle and that the second engagement groove is configured for engagement with any one of the first and second front stub axles. The term groove refers to a recess that extends from the outermost portion of the axle engagement structure into the axle engagement structure, i.e. from the bottommost portion of the axle engagement structure in use into the axle engagement structure. In other words, the term groove refers to a surface geometry that deviates from a fully planar outer surface. Instead of being referred to as grooves, the first and second engagement elements may also be referred to as first and second engagement channels or first and second engagement troughs. Such grooves are a particularly suitable means of engaging the axle engagement structure with a stub axle/rear axle, because the grooves provide a good compromise between ease of application, positioning flexibility and guidance/support on the stub axle/rear axle. The resulting axle engagement structure is easy to apply, because it can be placed manually onto the stub axle/rear axle from the top. Flexibility is provided, because the axle engagement structure, and thus the tool body coupled thereto, can be rotated around the stub axle/rear axle without leaving the engaged position. Good guidance and support is provided, because the stub axle/rear axle and the groove can be brought into engagement over an extended portion of the stub axle/rear axle along the groove. By providing two such grooves, these benefits can be easily made use of in two different engagement orientations and/or on different axles. The term groove may refer to an uninterrupted, elongated groove structure or may refer to a structure having two or more groove portions. In particular, one of the two engagement grooves may be split into two engagement groove portions by the other engagement groove.

According to an alternative embodiment, the first and second engagement elements are a first tubular channel and a second tubular channel. In other words, the first and second engagement elements may be openings through the axle engagement structure. The tubular channels may be configured to enable the go kart set up tool to slide onto an axle. In particular, the first tubular channel may be configured to slide the go kart set up tool onto the one of the first and second front stub axles or may be configured to slide the go kart set up tool onto the rear axle, depending on the embodiment. Further in particular, the second tubular channel may be configured to slide the go kart set up tool onto the one of the first and second front stub axles. The first and second tubular channels may be adapted to the dimensions of the front stub axles/rear axle, depending on the embodiment. Tubular channels provide for particularly good guidance and support on the respective axle. However, the mounting/de-mounting requires the respective wheel to be removed. It is also possible that one of the first and second engagement elements is an engagement groove and that the other of the first and second engagement elements is a tubular channel.

According to a further embodiment, the first and second engagement grooves are V-shaped grooves. Such V-shaped grooves are easy to produce and provide for an easy application of the go kart set up tool onto the stub axle/rear axle. During application, the stub axle/rear axle is naturally urged into the groove as far as possible, when the go kart set up tool is placed on top of the stub axle/rear axle. The term V-shaped does not imply that the two faces of the groove form a sharp corner at the bottom of the groove. A transitional radius may also be provided. It is also possible that the first and second engagement grooves have other shapes, such as partially circular shapes for engagement with the stub axle/rear axle. Partially circular grooves may be less comfortable during application, but may provide a larger engagement surface with the stub axle/rear axle. In contrast, V-shaped grooves may be better applicable to axles of different diameters. The opening angle of the V-shaped groove may be adapted to the diameter of the stub axle/rear axle. Analogously, the radius of the partially circular groove may be adapted to the diameter of the stub axle/rear axle.

According to a further embodiment, the first and second engagement elements cross. In a particular embodiment, the first and second engagement grooves cross. In another particular embodiment, the first and second tubular channels cross. In this way, the engagement space on the bottom of the go kart set up tool may be used for engagement with the stub axle in an optimized manner. In particular, two engagement elements may be provided that make use of a particularly large portion of the axle engagement structure. In a particular embodiment, the first and second engagement elements cross underneath the center of gravity of the go kart set up tool. In this way, the go kart set up tool may be positioned on the stub axle in both orientations in a particularly stable manner.

According to a further embodiment, the first engagement element is substantially perpendicular to the laser emission direction, when the laser emission direction is projected into the plane of the first and second engagement elements. Additionally or alternatively, the second engagement elements may be substantially parallel to the laser emission direction, when the laser emission direction is projected into the plane of the first and second engagement elements. In other words, the first and second engagement elements, which may be engagement grooves or tubular channels or any other suitable structure, may be rotated 90° with respect to each other. In this way, the exact alignment of the laser beam with the first front stub axle for the steering mechanism gauging and the exact alignment of the laser beam in a direction rotated 90° thereto for the longitudinal chassis alignment checking may be achieved by the structure of the axle engagement structure itself.

According to a further embodiment, the axle engagement structure is integral with the tool body, with the entire go kart set up tool having the first orientation, when the first engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles, and with the entire go kart set up tool having the second orientation, when the second engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles. In other words, the whole go kart set up tool may be placed onto the first front stub axle in two orientations. In yet other words, both the tool body and the axle engagement structure may be placed onto the first front stub axle in two orientations. The integral implementation of the tool body and the axle engagement structure allows for a highly stable overall configuration of the go kart set up tool. The go kart set up tool may be seen as a one piece tool, with some components, such as the level and the laser emitter being placed in the go kart set up tool. In this integral implementation, the tool body may form the upper portion of the go kart set up tool, while the axle engagement structure may form the lower portion of the go kart set up tool.

According to another embodiment, the axle engagement structure is integral with the tool body, with the entire go kart set up tool having the first orientation, when the first engagement element is in engagement with the rear axle, and with the entire go kart set up tool having the second orientation, when the second engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles. The advantages discussed in the preceding paragraph, in particular with respect to stability, equally apply to this embodiment.

According to an alternative embodiment, the axle engagement structure has exactly one engagement element and the axle engagement structure is separable from the tool body and attachable to the tool body in a first attachment configuration and in a second attachment configuration, with the tool body having the first orientation, when the axle engagement structure is attached to the tool body in the first attachment configuration and the one engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles, and with the tool body having the second orientation, when the axle engagement structure is attached to the tool body in the second attachment configuration and the one engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles. The exactly one engagement element is configured for engagement with any one of the first and second front stub axles. The separability of the tool body and the axle engagement structure allows for above described benefits of needing only one laser emitter and of providing two measurements directions in a framework where only one engagement element is provided. The degree of freedom of the tool body being usable in two different orientations is achieved via a relative rotation of the tool body with respect to the axle engagement structure. The one engagement element may be implemented in accordance with any of the embodiments discussed above with respect to the first and second engagement elements. In particular, the one engagement element may be an engagement groove, in particular a V-shaped engagement groove, or a tubular channel. The axle engagement structure may be attachable to the tool body in any suitable way that allows for a positional fixation of the two components.

According to another embodiment, the axle engagement structure has exactly one engagement element and the axle engagement structure is separable from the tool body and attachable to the tool body in a first attachment configuration and in a second attachment configuration, with the tool body having the first orientation, when the axle engagement structure is attached to the tool body in the first attachment configuration and the one engagement element is in engagement with the rear axle, and with the tool body having the second orientation, when the axle engagement structure is attached to the tool body in the second attachment configuration and the one engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles. The exactly one engagement element is configured both for engagement with the rear axle and for engagement with any one of the first and second front stub axles. The advantages discussed in the preceding paragraph equally apply to this embodiment.

According to a further embodiment, the axle engagement structure is magnetically attachable to the tool body. Such magnetic attachment allows for the acts of attachment and detachment being conveniently carried out by the user of the tool. The axle engagement structure may stay in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles, while the tool body may be pulled from the axle engagement structure and re-applied thereto in a different orientation.

According to a further embodiment, the tool body and/or the axle engagement structure comprise(s) a magnet, such that the go kart set up tool can be brought into magnetic engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles. Alternatively/additionally, the go kart set up tool can be brought into magnetic engagement with the rear axle. In other words, the whole go kart set up tool may be positioned on the one of the first and second front stub axles/on the rear axle and kept in place by the magnetic forces provided by the magnet. The whole tool may thus be very conveniently positionable onto the front stub axle/rear axle. The expression comprising a magnet is intended to include embodiments where the whole tool body and/or the whole axle engagement structure is a magnet that allows for attachment to the front stub axle/rear axle. In other words, it is possible that the whole go kart set up tool or the whole tool body and/or the whole axle engagement structure is magnetic. It is also possible to alternatively or additionally provide for other attachment means. For example, the tool body or the axle engagement structure may have one or more passages or ducts, through which a cable tie may be drawn. In this way, the go kart set up tool may be attached to the front stub axle/rear axle via the cable tie.

According to a further embodiment, the tool body comprises a first target surface for making an impinging laser beam visible to a user, with the first target surface having a first grid of markings, such that the go kart set up tool is usable as the first target for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart. The first target surface may also be referred to as an alignment target surface, and the first grid of markings may also be referred to as an alignment grid of markings. The terminology usable as the first target is to be understood in such a way that the go kart set up tool is also usable as the first target, independent of its functionality of emitting the laser beam. In other words, when providing a go kart set up tool according to such an embodiment, i.e. according to an embodiment having the first target surface, this tool can be used as a second device, i.e. as a target device, for any kind of laser emitting device placed on the front stub axle/rear axle. In particular, it can be used as the target device for a go kart set up tool in accordance with any of the embodiments described above, used as the laser emitting or source device. In yet other words, a combination of a first go kart set up tool in accordance with any of the embodiments described above and a second go kart set up tool having the first target surface allows for the check of the longitudinal alignment of the chassis with these two tools only. For this purpose, the second go kart set up tool, i.e. the go kart set up tool having the first target surface, may be placed on a rear axle of the go kart or any other predetermined structure that is part of or coupled to the rear of the chassis. In case the first go kart set up tool is configured to be placed on the rear axle, with the laser emitter aiming towards the front in the first orientation of the tool body, the second go kart set up tool, i.e. the go kart set up tool having the first target surface, may be placed on a front stub axle of the go kart or any other predetermined structure that is part of or coupled to the front of the chassis.

According to a particular embodiment, the first target surface is configured to measure at least one parameter indicative of at least one of crab, twist and bend of the chassis via the impinging laser beam.

When the go kart set up tool has the first target surface, as described above, the go kart set up tool is usable both as the source of a measurement, i.e. as the tool emitting the laser beam, and as the sink of the measurement, i.e. as the tool making the laser beam visible.

The first grid of markings may be a chassis alignment scale. In particular, the first grid may give an indication to which extent the longitudinal alignment of the chassis on the measured side of the go kart, i.e. on the left side or the right side of the go kart, is off the desired alignment. As the grid may make the misalignment visible in two dimensions, a twist of the chassis as well as a bent of the chassis may be made visible by the measurement.

It is pointed out that the provision of the first target surface on the go kart set up tool is not a necessary feature. It is also possible to use a simple target device, such as a plastic plate with an according grid, as the target device. In that case, the go kart set up tool according to any of the embodiments of the invention is used as the laser source device only, and no second such device is used on the target side.

The tool body may have a substantially cuboid shape. In particular, one of the sides of the cuboid tool body may comprise the first target surface. In this way, a plane target surface is provided that is convenient for making the impinging laser beam visible and that can be easily oriented substantially perpendicular to the impinging laser beam.

According to a further embodiment, the tool body comprises a second target surface for making an impinging laser beam visible to a user, with the second target surface having a second grid of markings, such that the go kart set up tool is usable as the second target for gauging the steering mechanism of the go kart. The second target surface may also be referred to as a steering mechanism gauging target surface, and the second grid of markings may also be referred to as a steering mechanism gauging grid of markings. In this way, the go kart set up tool may be used as the laser sink during the gauging of the steering mechanism. The go kart set up tool may be used as the laser emitting tool and as the laser visualizing tool at the same time, i.e. it may simultaneously emit a laser beam and make another impinging laser beam visible. In this way, by providing two such go kart set up tools, the left and right portions of the steering mechanism can be gauged at the same time. However, it is also possible that the go kart set up tool may be used as the laser emitting device and as the target device of the gauging operation at different points in time.

According to a particular embodiment, the second target surface is configured to measure at least one parameter indicative of at least one of camber and toe in/toe out of the steering mechanism of the go kart via the impinging laser beam.

The second grid of markings may be a steering mechanism scale. In particular, the second grid of markings may have markings in a first dimension that are an indication of the camber of the steering mechanism. The impinging laser beam may then allow for a reading of a camber angle on the second target surface. The second grid of markings may additionally/alternatively have markings in a second dimension that are an indication of the toe in/toe out of the steering mechanism. The impinging laser beam may then allow for a reading of a toe in/toe out angle on the second target surface.

According to a further embodiment, the laser emitter may be positioned in the tool body in such a way that the laser beam leaves the tool body from the second target surface. In particular, the laser beam may leave the tool body from a central portion of the second target surface. In this way, the go kart set up tool may be conveniently used as the source device, emitting the laser beam, and as the sink device, making a second laser beam visible, at the same time. It may allow for a simultaneous measurement of both the left and the right portion of the steering mechanism at the same time in a particularly convenient manner. The alignment of the two go kart set up tools may be conveniently achieved via the positioning of the laser emission in the central region of the respective second target surface.

As mentioned above, the tool body may have a substantially cuboid shape. One side of the cuboid tool body may comprise the second target surface. In this way, a plane target surface is provided that is convenient for making the impinging laser beam visible and that can be easily oriented substantially perpendicular to the impinging laser beam. The first target surface and the second target surface may be arranged on different sides of the cuboid tool body. In a particular embodiment, the first target surface and the second target surface may be arranged on adjacent sides of the cuboid tool body.

According to a further embodiment, the tool body has a target surface for making an impinging laser beam from a separate laser emission tool visible to a user of the go kart set up tool. The target surface comprises a first scale, comprising a plurality of first markings, and a second scale, comprising a plurality of second markings, with the first scale and the second scale having the same scaling. The first scale and the second scale are spaced apart, such that, upon the separate laser emission tool being attached to the front wheel steering mechanism and the front wheel steering mechanism being turned and the impinging laser beam moving across the target surface as a result thereof, a first measurement on the first scale and a second measurement on the second scale can be made by visual inspection, with a difference between the first measurement and the second measurement being an indication of the caster angle or of the king pin angle of a steerable stub axle of the go kart. In this way, a convenient way of measuring at least one of a caster angle and a king pin angle of a front wheel steering mechanism of a go kart is provided. The target surface described herein with respect to the caster angle/king pin angle measurement may be the first target surface, described above, or the second target surface, described above, or another target surface on the go kart set up tool.

The provision of two spaced scales with the same scaling allows for differential measurements that allow for the determination of the caster angle and/or of the king pin angle with sufficient accuracy without additional efforts for having a datum reference point or exact positioning. As compared to prior art approaches, where the separate laser emission tool had to be aimed at a specific calibration point before a caster angle measurement was carried out, the differential nature of the measurement eliminates the need for prior calibration and/or prior exact alignment of the go kart set up tool and the separate laser emission tool. Deviations from a perfect measurement scenario equally or similarly affect the first and second measurements, such that the differential measurement allows for a determination of the caster angle and/or the king pin angle with sufficient accuracy. The caster angle/king pin angle measurement is independent from the concrete first and second measurements on the first and second scales, as only the difference between the first and second measurements is being used as an indication of the caster angle/king pin angle. Also, the differential nature of the measurement reduces the sensitivity to the exact positioning of the separate laser emission tool.

Sufficiently reliable results can be achieved with the go kart set up tool and the separate laser emission tool being in different places and having different orientations. For example, with the go kart set up tool being placed on the right front stub axle of the go kart and the separate laser emission tool being placed on the left front stub axle of the go kart, or vice versa, reliable caster angle measurements may be made irrespective of the camber and toe in/toe out set up of the steering mechanism. In this way, a highly convenient and quick way of measuring the caster angle is made possible. Reliable king pin angle measurements may be carried out with the go kart set up tool having a fixed position with respect to the go kart chassis and with the separate laser emission tool being placed on a steerable front stub axle. For example, the separate laser emission tool may be placed on the right (left) front stub axle of the go kart and the go kart set up tool may be placed on the right (left) side of the rear axle of the go kart or another fixed structure in the right (left) rear region of the go kart, which allows for a measurement of the king pin angle of the right (left) front stub axle.

The expression of the steering mechanism being turned refers to the steering mechanism being operated from left to right or vice versa. In other words, it refers to the steerable stub axle of the go kart being rotated from forward to backward or vice versa with respect to its suspension point, such as with respect to the king pin. This turning of the steering mechanism may be effected via a turning of the steering wheel of the go kart or via manual or other movement of any portion of the steering mechanism between the steering wheel and the steerable stub axle.

With the separate laser emission tool being attached to the front wheel steering mechanism, the front wheel steering mechanism being turned results in the laser emission direction of the separate laser emission tool changing together with the front wheel steering mechanism turning. Due to the distance between the separate laser emission tool and the go kart set up tool, this changing of the laser emission direction results in the impinging laser beam travelling across the entire width of the target surface for small changes in the front wheel steering mechanism. Due to this amplification of the motion of the laser beam, the measurements may be carried out conveniently. According to an embodiment, the separate laser emission tool may be attached to one of the first and second front stub axles of the go kart.

The expression scale refers to an arrangement of the respective plurality of markings that allows for the user of the go kart set up tool to make different readings, depending on where the laser beam from the separate laser emission tool hits the target surface in the particular measurement operation. The expression scaling refers to the underlying meaning of the respective plurality of markings, i.e. to the convention what values the plurality of markings mean. The first and second caster scale having the same scaling means that the underlying theory of the two scales are the same, but does not necessarily require all markings to be identical. For example, both the first and second scales may directly relate to the measured angle in degrees, but one scale may have one marking per every degree, while the other scale may have one marking per every two degrees. While having different step widths in this example, the first and second scales still have the same scaling, because they rely on the same scaling principle. The scaling may be configured with different underlying assumptions. For example, the scaling may be based on the assumption that the separate laser emission tool is placed on the other steerable stub axle and is moved during the turning of the steering mechanism in an opposite manner.

When the first and second scales are intended for caster angle measurements, they may also be referred to as first and second caster scales. Analogously, when the first and second scales are intended for king pin angle measurements, they may also be referred to as first and second king pin angle scales.

According to a further embodiment, the axle engagement structure is adapted to position the go kart set up tool on any one of a right steerable front stub axle and a left steerable front stub axle of the go kart, with the target surface facing towards the other one of the right steerable front stub axle and the left steerable front stub axle of the go kart, such that, upon the separate laser emission tool being positioned on the other one of the right steerable front stub axle and the left steerable front stub axle of the go kart and upon the steering mechanism being turned and the impinging laser beam moving across the target surface as a result thereof, the difference between the first measurement and the second measurement is an indication of the caster angle of the one of the right steerable front stub axle and the left steerable front stub axle, onto which the go kart set up tool is positioned. In other words, the axle engagement structure has a configuration that allows for the go kart set up tool to be placed onto any one of the right and left front stub axles of the go kart, and the axle engagement structure and the target surface have such a relative positioning on the tool body that the positioning of the go kart set up tool on the one of the right and left front stub axles of the go kart via the axle engagement structure results in the target surface facing towards the other one of the right and left front stub axles of the go kart. The target surface is thus able to make an impinging laser beam visible that originates from somewhere in the direction of the other one of the right and left front stub axles. In particular, the target surface may be positioned in a plane that is orthogonal to the one of the right and left front stub axles.

A caster angle measurement operation is described for the example of the go kart set up tool being placed on the steerable right front stub axle of the go kart and the separate laser emission tool being placed on the steerable left front stub axle and emitting the laser beam towards the right front stub axle. The go kart set up tool may be placed upright on the right front stub axle, when the steering mechanism is oriented straight. It is also possible that the go kart set up tool is placed in an inclined position with respect to the right front stub axle, when the steering mechanism is oriented straight. Due to the rotation of the right front stub axle and its point of suspension, referred to as caster, a turning of the front wheel steering mechanism results in an inclination of the originally upright go kart set up tool towards the front and back or in a change in inclination of the originally inclined go kart set up tool towards the front and back. This inclination is made visual by the impinging laser beam, when travelling across the target surface from left to right (or right to left) and changing its height above the right front stub axle in the process. This in turn leads to different readings on the first and second scales, giving an indication of the caster angle of the right front stub axle. It is possible that the caster angle of the left front stub axle also has an influence on these readings due to the inclination of the separate laser emission tool during the turning of the steering mechanism. Accordingly, the measured angle may be a compound caster angle that depends on both the caster angles of the right front stub axle and the left front stub axles. However, such compound caster angle is also a good indication of the caster angle of the right front stub axle.

According to a further embodiment, the axle engagement structure is adapted to position the go kart set up tool on a rear axle of the go kart, with the target surface facing towards a front of the go kart, such that, upon the separate laser emission tool being positioned on a steerable front stub axle of the go kart and upon the steering mechanism being turned and the impinging laser beam moving across the target surface as a result thereof, the difference between the first measurement and the second measurement is an indication of the king pin angle of the steerable front stub axle, onto which the separate laser emission tool is positioned. In other words, the axle engagement structure has a configuration that allows for the go kart set up tool to be placed onto the rear axle of the go kart, and the axle engagement structure and the target surface have such a relative positioning on the tool body that the positioning of the go kart set up tool on the rear axle of the go kart via the axle engagement structure results in the target surface facing towards the front of the go kart. The target surface is thus able to make an impinging laser beam visible that originates from somewhere in the front of the go kart, in particular from one of the left and right front stub axles, with the king pin angle measurement relying on the same principles as discussed above with respect to the caster angle measurement. In particular, the target surface may be positioned in a plane that is parallel to the rear axle.

In each of the caster/king pin angle measurement operations, the tool that is placed on a steerable front stub axle inclines during the turning of the front wheel steering mechanism. In particular, the tool inclines in a front/back direction of the go kart as a result of a non-zero caster angle, and the tool inclines in a left/right direction of the go kart as a result of a non-zero king pin angle. This inclination can be made visual either by placing the go kart set up tool, having the target surface, on one steerable front stub axle and positioning the separate laser emission tool on the other steerable front stub axle for emitting a laser beam towards the target surface or by placing the go kart set up tool, having the target surface, on the right (left) side of the rear axle of the go kart and positioning the separate laser emission tool on the right (left) front stub axle of the go kart for emitting a laser beam towards the target surface. The visualisation of the inclination via the laser beam leads to different crossing points of the first and second scales, when the front wheel steering mechanism is turned, which crossing points represent the first and second measurements for measuring the caster angle or the king pin angle.

It is pointed out that it is also possible that the go kart set up tool has two target surfaces. One target surface may be arranged on the tool body in such a way that, when the axle engagement structure is in engagement with one of the left and right front stub axles, said one target surface faces towards the other one of the left and right front stub axles. The other target surface may be arranged on the tool body in such a way that, when the axle engagement structure is in engagement with the rear axle, said other target surface faces towards the front of the go kart. It is also possible that the go kart set up tool has a target surface that has two pairs of scales, namely a first caster scale and a second caster scale as well as a first king pin angle scale and a second king pin angle scale. It is further possible that the go kart set up tool has a target surface that has a first scale and a second scale, wherein the first and second scales are usable for both caster angle measurements and king pin angle measurements.

According to a further embodiment, the plurality of first markings are arranged in a linear manner and the plurality of second markings are arranged in a linear manner. In other words, the plurality of first markings form a straight line arrangement and the plurality of second markings form a straight line arrangement. In this context, the arrangement in a linear manner does not mean that the scaling of the first and second scales is linear. It only means that the geometric arrangement of the markings on the target surface results in a linear structure. In this way, the first and second markings may be conveniently placed on the target surface, such as along the left and right edges thereof. It is pointed out that the plurality of first markings and the plurality of second markings do not have to be arranged in a linear manner. It is possible that the plurality of first markings and/or the plurality of second markings have a curved arrangement, e.g. in the form of two tan-function curves converging towards each other at the top or at the bottom of the target surface.

According to a further embodiment, the first scale and the second scale are arranged in parallel. This again helps in placing the first and second scales in convenient positions and making the handling of the go kart set up tool easy. The user may easily take the first and second measurements on the parallel scales as he can see both scales in the same manner from one point of view. Again, it is possible that the first and second scales are not arranged in parallel. They may for example also be arranged in two straight lines that converge towards each other at the top or at the bottom of the target surface.

According to a further embodiment, the first and second scales are spaced apart by a distance of between 2 cm and 20 cm, in particular by a distance of between 3 cm and 8 cm, further in particular by a distance of between 3 cm and 6 cm. Such a spacing has been found to be a good compromise between implementing a compact go kart set up tool and reaching large enough of a difference between the first and second measurements, such that the resulting measurement of the caster angle or the king pin angle is not too sensitive to measurement inaccuracies. While a larger distance between the first and second scales is advantageous for accuracy and/or resolution of the measurements, a smaller distance allows for a more compact go kart set up tool.

According to a further embodiment, the plurality of first markings and the plurality of second markings represent degree values. In this way, the user may directly read the caster angle/king pin angle from the difference in the first and second measurements, again helping in providing a quick and convenient way of measuring the caster angle/king pin angle. It is, however, pointed out that the first and second markings may also represent any other kind of values that can be converted into degree values by the user according to a pre-defined conversion scheme.

According to a further embodiment, the first scale and the second scale each have a linear scaling. In this context, the term linear refers to a constant step-width of the scaling. In other words, the difference between two measurements made on the first end of the scales represents the same angle indication as the same difference between two measurements made on the second end of the scales. With the first and second scales having a linear scaling and their markings representing degree values, the resulting measurement is an approximation of a trigonometric tan-function. While an exact measurement would need to rely on a relation of the difference between the first and second measurements to the spacing of the two scales via the tan-function, it has been found that the linear scaling is a sufficient approximation for common caster angles of between 5° and 20°, in particular for the most common caster angles of between 10° and 15°. The linear scaling may for example be configured in such a way that it leads to accurate results for a caster angle of 10° or 11° or 12° or 13° or 14° or 15°. The term degree and the character ° are used interchangeably herein. The linear scaling has also been found to be a sufficient approximation for common king pin angles. It is pointed out that the first and second scales may also have non-linear scalings. In particular, the first and second scales may have scalings that are based on a tan-function.

According to a further embodiment, the linear scaling is between 0.4 mm/degree and 0.6 mm/degree, in particular about 0.5 mm/degree. It has been found that this value range of the linear scaling allows for easy to read and, thus, quick measurements with sufficient accuracy for a common laser beam width. The exact value of the linear scaling used depends on the spacing of the first and second caster scales, on the assumed distance between the go kart set up tool and the separate laser emission tool, and on whether the go kart set up tool is assumed to be stationary or whether it is placed on a steerable stub axle. In a particular embodiment, the linear scaling of the first and second scales is 0.5 mm/degree, and the first and second scales are spaced apart 37 mm.

According to a further embodiment, the target surface is a planar surface. This again helps in making the first and second measurements easily readable to the user of the go kart set up tool. According to a particular embodiment, the first and second caster scales are arranged on opposite sides of the target surface. In this way, the whole extension of the target surface is made use of for the caster measurement operation, leading to a high accuracy. According to a particular embodiment, the target surface may be arranged on the tool body in such a way, that it has an upright orientation, when the go kart set up tool is placed on a front axle or a rear axle in a vertical orientation.

According to a further embodiment, the tool body has a generally cuboid shape, with one side of the cuboid tool body comprising the target surface. The cuboid tool body is a favourable structure for providing a planar target surface, from which the measurements may be conveniently read. As discussed above, it is also possible that the go kart set up tool may have two target surfaces. They may be arranged on different sides of the cuboid tool body.

As the go kart set up tool has a laser emitter, the go kart set up tool may function both as the source of the measurements, i.e. as the tool emitting the laser beam, and as the sink of the measurements, i.e. as the tool making the impinging laser beam visible on the target surface. When two such go kart set up tools are provided, each of the go kart set up tools may simultaneously function as the source and the sink of measurements in operation. In this way, the caster angle of both front wheels may be determined very quickly in one measurement operation, when the two go kart set up tools are placed on the left and right front stub axles.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention further include a set of a plurality of go kart set up tools, comprising a first go kart set up tool in accordance with any of the embodiments above, and a second go kart set up tool in accordance with any of the embodiments above and having at least one of the first target surface and the second target surface, wherein, in operation, at least one of checking the longitudinal alignment and gauging the steering mechanism can be carried out with the first and second go kart set up tools only. In other words, the set comprises two go kart set up tools in accordance with any of the embodiments above, wherein at least the second go kart set up tool is usable as a target device, such that at least one of the chassis alignment checking and the steering mechanism gauging can be carried out by a user without the help of any other measurement tools.

According to a further embodiment, the second go kart set up tool has both the first target surface and the second target surface. Accordingly, both the checking of the chassis alignment and the gauging of the steering mechanism can be carried out with the first and second go kart set up tools only. Alternatively/additionally, the go kart set up tool may have the target surface with the first and second scales, discussed above. The target surface with the first and second scales may be incorporated into the first and/or second target surface.

According to a further embodiment, both the first and second go kart set up tools have the first target surface and/or the second target surface and/or the target surface with the first and second scales, discussed above. Further in particular, the first and second go kart set up tools may be equal in design or may be mirror images of each other, at least with respect to the features discussed above. The first and second go kart set up tools may be identical or mirror images of each other with the exception of production tolerances, etc. In this way, they can both be equally used as source and sink devices for the measurements.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described with respect to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 shows a go kart set up tool in accordance with a first exemplary embodiment of the invention in a perspective view.

FIG. 2A shows a go kart set up tool in accordance with a second exemplary embodiment of the invention in a perspective view.

FIG. 2B shows a go kart set up tool in accordance with a third exemplary embodiment of the invention in a perspective view.

FIG. 3 shows selected components of the go kart set up tool of FIG. 2A in another perspective view.

FIG. 4A shows the go kart set up tool of FIG. 2A in yet another perspective view.

FIG. 4B shows the go kart set up tool of FIG. 2B in yet another perspective view.

FIGS. 5A-5D show exemplary embodiments of the first and second target surfaces of a go kart set up tool in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 6 shows the go kart set up tool of FIG. 2B, placed on a front stub axle.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 shows a go kart set up tool 2 according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention. The go kart set up tool 2 has a tool body 4 and an axle engagement structure 6. In the present embodiment, the tool body 4 and the axle engagement structure 6 are integrally formed, i.e. they are a one-piece structure, such that the tool body 4 forms the upper portion of this one-piece structure and that the axle engagement structure 6 forms the lower portion of this one-piece structure. It is, however, also possible that the tool body 4 and the axle engagement structure 6 are separate pieces that may be coupled to each other in one or two or more configurations.

The tool body 4 has a substantially cuboid outer shape, wherein the four side faces of the cuboid structure are of equal area. This in turn means that the top surface of the tool body 4 has a square shape. The top-to-bottom extension of the tool body 4 is roughly twice the width of the four side faces. Accordingly, it is fair to say that the tool body 4, and thus the go kart set up tool 2 as a whole, has its longitudinal direction of extension in the vertical direction. With the tool body 4 and the axle engagement structure 6 being a one-piece structure, only the lower portion of this one-piece structure, which provides for the engagement with the axles of a go kart, is referred to as the axle engagement structure 6. The details of the axle engagement structure 6 are described with respect to FIG. 4 below. The remainder of the one-piece structure, i.e. the portion above the axle engagement structure 6, is referred to as the tool body 4.

The go kart set up tool 2 further comprises a first target surface 20 and a second target surface 30. The first target surface 20 and the second target surface 30 are arranged on adjacent sides of the cuboid tool body 4. The first and second target surfaces 20, 30 cover substantially the entire width of the respective side face of the tool body 4. They further are equal in height and both cover approximately 60-70% of the height of the tool body 4 on the respective side faces.

The first target surface 20 has a first grid of markings, covering substantially the entire first target surface 20. The second target surface 30 has a second grid of markings, covering the second target surface substantially entirely in the width-wise direction and covering roughly 70-80% of the second target surface 30 in the height-dimension. The first grid of markings on the first target surface 20 and the second grid of markings on the second target surface 30 and their use during measurements are described in greater detail below. In particular, the first target surface 20 of FIG. 1 corresponds to the first target surface 20 shown in FIG. 5A, and the second target surface of FIG. 1 corresponds to the second target surface 30 shown in FIG. 5C.

In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1, the first target surface 20 is provided in the form of a sticker that is applied to the tool body 4. Analogously, the second target surface 30 is provided in the form of a sticker that is applied to the tool body 4. However, it is also possible that the first and second target surfaces 20, 30 are provided in different ways on the tool body 4. For example, the respective markings may be drawn right onto or machined into the tool body 4.

The go kart set up tool 2 further comprises a laser emitter 10, with the laser emitter 10 emitting a laser beam from a central portion of the second grid of markings of the second target surface 30. Further, the go kart set up tool comprises an on/off switch 12, which is disposed roughly in the middle between the second target surface 30 and the axle engagement structure 6 on the tool body 4.

FIG. 2A shows a go kart set up tool 2 in accordance with a second exemplary embodiment of the invention. The go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 2A is very similar to the go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 1. Like elements are denoted with like reference numerals and will not be described again. Reference is made to above description of these elements.

The go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 2A is shown in a different perspective view, such that the top face of the tool body 4 is visible in the viewing direction of FIG. 2A. In this way, it can be seen that the go kart set up tool 2 comprises a level 8. The level 8 is a water level, wherein an air bubble 82 indicates via its position within a liquid-filled compartment if the go kart set up tool 2 is oriented vertically. As the water level 8 is round and as the air bubble 82 is free to move around the whole liquid-filled compartment, a two-dimensional vertical alignment of the go kart set up tool can be observed via the level 8. For some of the measurements described below, the go kart set up tool 2 is oriented vertically in both dimensions, while a vertical alignment in one dimension is sufficient for other measurements.

In FIG. 2A, the go kart set up tool 2 is shown without the first target surface 20 and the second target surface 30 in order to provide a better illustration of the tool body 4. However, the positions for the first target surface 20 and the second target surface 30 are shown as slightly recessed as compared to the remainder of the tool body 4. In this way, the tool body 4 reserves the space for and indicates the appropriate positioning of the first and second target surfaces 20, 30.

FIG. 2B shows a go kart set up tool 2 in accordance with a third exemplary embodiment of the invention. The go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 2B is identical to the go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 2A, with one exception. Like elements are denoted with like reference numerals and will not be described again. Reference is made to above description of these elements. The only difference between the go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 2A and the go kart set up tool of FIG. 2B is the provision of cable tie ducts 50. The cable tie ducts 50 extend through the axle engagement structure between the left and right sides thereof and allow for cable ties or zip ties to be inserted for fastening the go kart set up tool to an axle. In this way, the go kart set up tool 2 may be fastened to a go kart axle as an optional fastening means in addition to the engagement via the axle engagement structure 6, which will be described below.

FIG. 3 shows the integrated one-piece structure of the tool body 4 and the axle engagement structure 6 of the go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 2A in a different perspective view. In particular, the integrated one-piece structure of the tool body 4 and the axle engagement structure 6 is shown from a perspective top rear view. In FIG. 3, the tool body 4 is shown without a compartment cover, which forms the back face of the substantially cuboid tool body 4 during use. In the absence of this compartment cover, it can be seen that the tool body 4 is substantially hollow. On the inside of the tool body 4, a laser emitter holding structure 44 and an on/off switch holding structure 46 are provided for holding the laser emitter 10 and the on/off switch 12, respectively, in an assembled configuration. Further, the tool body 4 has a level recess 42 on its top face for housing the level 8 in the assembled configuration. In the assembled configuration, the space within the tool body 4 is further used for arranging one or more batteries or other sources of electric energy and appropriate circuit elements that interconnect the on/off switch 12, the laser emitter 10 and the source(s) of electric energy.

The tool body 4 further comprises two magnet compartments 48. These magnet compartments 48 are provided for inserting magnets, which allow for a magnetic engagement between the go kart set up tool 4 and the go kart axle. The magnetic engagement may be provided as an optional engagement mechanism in addition to any of the other engagement means described herein.

FIG. 4A shows the go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 2A in a different perspective view, namely partially from the bottom. This angle nicely illustrates the design of the axle engagement structure 6. The axle engagement structure 6 comprises a first engagement groove 62 and a second engagement groove 64.

The second engagement groove 64 extends from the front side of the go kart set up tool 2, i.e. from the side comprising the on/off switch 12 and the laser emitter 10, to the opposite back side of the go kart set up tool 2. In other words, the second engagement groove 64 extends in a linear manner from the front to the back of the go kart set up tool 2. Further, the second engagement groove 64 has a V-shape, with the V-shape extending between two corners of the go kart set up tool 2 on the front side and the back side, respectively. The V-shape of the second engagement groove 64 comprises planar side faces that are coupled to each other via a rounded connection surface. In other words, the V-shape is a V-shape with a round interconnection between the two planar side faces. The second engagement groove 64 extends a distance of about 10-15% of the total height of the go kart set up tool 2 from the bottom into the go kart set up tool 2.

The first engagement groove 62 runs between the left and right side faces of the go kart set up tool 2. The first engagement groove also has a V-shape with planar side faces and a rounded connection surface. Further, the V-shape of the first engagement groove 62 extends between the two corners of the left and right side faces, respectively. The first engagement groove 22 extends a distance of about 5-10% of the total height of the go kart set up tool 2 from the bottom into the go kart set up tool 2.

As the first engagement groove 62 has a smaller height extension than the second engagement groove 64 and as the first engagement groove 62, running from the left side to the right side of the go kart set up tool 2, crosses the second engagement groove 64, running from the front to the back of the go kart set up tool 2, the first engagement groove 62 is split into two groove portions by the crossing second engagement groove 64. Due to this split of the first engagement groove 62, the groove portions of the first engagement groove 62 have substantially triangular side faces. It is pointed out that it is also possible that the first and second engagement grooves have the same height extension into the go kart set up tool 2 or that the first engagement groove has a greater height extension than the second engagement groove 64.

The first engagement groove 62 forms a first engagement element, and the second engagement groove 64 forms a second engagement element. The go kart set up tool 2 may be brought into engagement with an axle of the go kart by means of each of the first engagement element and the second engagement element. In other words, the go kart set up tool 2 may be placed onto a go kart axle with the first engagement groove 62 being placed along the longitudinal extension of the go kart axle or with the second engagement groove 64 being placed along the longitudinal extension of the go kart axle.

The example of the go kart set up tool 2 being placed on the right front stub axle of a go kart is described as follows. It is a first option to place the go kart set up tool 2 onto the right front stub axle of the go kart, with the axle being in engagement with the first engagement groove 62 and with the laser emitter 10 pointing backwards. In this way, the tool body 4, the laser emitter 10 and the whole go kart set up tool 2 have a first orientation where the laser emitter 10 is aiming towards the rear of the go kart. With a suitable target being placed at the rear of the go kart, which might be a target in the form of the first target surface 20 of FIG. 1, a measurement regarding the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart may be taken. By comparing this measurement to an analogous measurement with respect to the left side of the go kart, a differential analysis may be used for determining the longitudinal chassis alignment and for determining a potential crab and/or bend and/or twist of the chassis.

It is a second option to place the go kart set up tool 2 onto the right front stub axle of the go kart, with the second engagement groove 64 being in engagement with the axle and with the laser emitter 10 pointing towards the left. In this way, the tool body 4, the laser emitter 10 and the whole go kart set up tool 2 are placed onto the right front stub axle in a second orientation. With a suitable target, such as the second target surface 30 of FIG. 1, being arranged on the left front stub axle of the go kart, the set up of the steering mechanism of the go kart can be measured.

The different depths of the first engagement groove 62 and the second engagement groove 64 have the effect that the laser emitter has different heights above the front stub axle in the first orientation and the second orientation. This may be desirable for evening out height differences between the front axles and the rear axle during the measurement. However, this is an optional feature, and the depths of the first and second engagement grooves 62, 64 may also be the same. It is also possible to adjust the respective targets accordingly or to even out such height differences in other ways. Moreover, it is also possible that no height adjustment may be necessary for the particular go kart to be measured.

FIG. 4B shows the go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 2B in a perspective view that corresponds to the perspective view of FIG. 4A. Again, the go kart set up tool 2 of FIG. 4B is identical to the go kart set up tool of FIG. 4A, with the exception of the provision of the cable tie ducts 50. There are provided four cable tie ducts 50, with two respective pairs of cable tie ducts 50 establishing a linear connection between the left face and the right face of the axle engagement structure 6.

FIG. 6 shows the go kart set up tool 2 of FIGS. 2B and 4B, placed on a left front stub axle 70 in the second orientation, i.e. with the laser emitter 10 aiming towards the other front stub axle, i.e. aiming towards the right front stub axle. The left front stub axle 70 is coupled to a suspension structure 72, which in turn is mounted to the go kart chassis. It is apparent from FIG. 6 that the go kart set up tool 2 can be lifted up from the left front stub axle 70, can be rotated 90° around its longitudinal axis and can be placed on the left front stub axle 70 with the laser emitter 10 aiming towards the rear of the go kart. This is made possible by the provision of the two engagement grooves in the depicted exemplary embodiment of the go kart set up tool 2.

Exemplary embodiments of the first target surface 20 and the second target surface 30 are now described with respect to FIG. 5. In FIGS. 5A and 5B, examples of the first target surface 20 are shown. In FIGS. 5C and 5D, examples of the second target surface 30 are shown.

The first target surface 20 of FIG. 5A is generally rectangular, as shown in FIG. 1 as well. The first target surface 20 has a first grid of markings 22, which comprises seven vertical lines and eleven horizontal lines. The first grid of markings 22 covers a very large portion of the first target surface 20. On the left of the first grid of markings 22, a first king pin angle scale 24 is provided. The first king pin angle scale 24 extends almost along the entire height extension of the first target surface 20. It has a linear scale, covering the values from 0 to 105. The values 0 to 105 are indicated by a plurality of first markings, which are a plurality of lines of different lengths in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 5A. On the right of the first grid of markings 22, an analogous second king pin angle scale 26 is provided. The second king pin angle scale 26 extends almost along the entire height extension of the first target surface 20. It has a linear scale, covering the values from 0 to 105. The values 0 to 105 are indicated by a plurality of second markings, which are a plurality of lines of different lengths in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 5A. The first target surface 20 further has the indication RIGHT REAR written thereon. This indication tells the user that the first target surface 20 is primarily intended to be placed on the right side of the rear axle of the go kart for the measurements. However, the first target surface 20 may also be placed on the left side of the rear axle as well as on any of the two front stub axles for measurements.

A measurement of the longitudinal chassis alignment is now described with respect to the first target surface 20 of FIG. 5A. For the measurement, a first go kart set up tool, such as the one shown in FIG. 1, is placed onto the right front stub axle of the go kart, with the laser emitter 10 pointing towards the rear of the go kart. Further, a second go kart set up tool, such as the one shown in FIG. 1 and having the first target surface 20 as shown in FIG. 5A, is placed on the rear axle of the go kart, in particular onto a portion of the rear axle on the right side thereof, with the first target surface 20 facing towards the front of the go kart. In this way, the laser beam, emitted by the laser emitter 10, impinges of the first target surface 20. For the measurement, the steering mechanism may be brought into such a configuration that no camber, no toe-in/toe-out and no caster are present. Further, both the first go kart set up tool, placed on the right front stub axle, and the second go kart set up tool, placed on the rear axle, are brought into a fully vertical position with the help of the respective levels. Further, the first go kart set up tool, placed on the right front stub axle, and the second go kart set up tool, placed on the rear axle, are placed in pre-defined positions along the longitudinal extensions of the axles. In this way, the readings can show a deviation from a calibrated expected reading. During the actual measurement, the laser beam impinges on the first target surface 20 at a specific position on the first grid of markings 22. This specific position may be examined by the user of the go kart set up tool 2 and be interpreted as a measure of the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart. A horizontal deviation from an expected impingement point may indicate a bend in the chassis, while a vertical deviation from an expected impingement point may indicate a twist of the chassis. The measurement may analogously be carried out between the left front stub axle and the left side of the rear axle.

It is pointed out that the checking of the longitudinal chassis alignment may be made without zeroing the camber and/or the toe in/toe out and/or the caster of the steering mechanism and/or without relying on predefined positions of the go kart set up tool along the longitudinal extensions of the front axles and the rear axle. In particular, the measurement may be made by carrying out both the left measurement between the left front stub axle and the rear axle as well as the right measurement between the right front stub axle and the rear axle. In this case, a differential analysis between the measurements can be made that allows for examining the longitudinal chassis alignment. The measurement influences introduced by the steering mechanism and/or the actual positions of the go kart set up tools along the longitudinal extensions of the axles may cancel out in this differential analysis, such that valid measurements of the longitudinal chassis alignment may still be made.

Another first target surface 20′ is shown in FIG. 5B. The first target surface 20′ is almost identical to the first target surface 20 of FIG. 5A. The first grid of markings 22′ of the first target surface 20′ is identical to the first grid of markings 22 of the first target surface 20. The first and second king pin angle scales 24′ and 26′ are identical to the first and second king pin angle scales 24 and 26, but their positions on the left and the right of the first target surface are interchanged, which can be seen by the interchanged letters A and B on top of the first and second king pin scales. The first target surface 20′ is denoted LEFT REAR instead of RIGHT REAR. It is primarily intended to be used on the left side of the rear axle of the go kart, but can also be placed on the right side of the rear axle as well as on any of the two front stub axles for measurements. The king pin angle measurement operation, which is illustrated by line 28, will be described later.

FIG. 5C shows an exemplary embodiment of the second target surface 30, as already shown in FIG. 1. The second target surface 30 has a substantially rectangular shape. It comprises a second grid of markings 32 that substantially covers the upper 75% of the second target surface 30. The second grid of markings 32 has seven vertical lines and nine horizontal lines as well as a center point, with the center point being the location of the laser emitter, as shown in FIG. 1. On the left of the second grid of markings 32, a first caster scale 34 is provided. The first caster scale 34 extends along the entire length of the second grid of markings 32 in the height dimension. It has a linear scale, covering the values from 0 to 85. The values 0 to 85 are indicated by a plurality of first markings, which are a plurality of lines of different lengths in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 5C. On the right side of the second grid of markings 32, an analogous second caster scale 36 is provided. It extends substantially along the entire height of the second grid of markings 32. It has a linear scale, covering the values from 0 to 85. The values 0 to 85 are indicated by a plurality of second markings, which are a plurality of lines of different lengths in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 5C. The second target surface 30 further comprises an arrow and an indication FRONT. This indication and the arrow show that the second target surface 30 is primarily intended to be used on the right front stub axle. It is, however, also possible that the second target surface 30 is placed on the left front stub axle for measurements. The second target surface 30 further comprises the indications POSITIVE CAMBER, provided in the upper half of the second grid of markings 32, NEGATIVE CAMBER, provided in the lower half of the second grid of markings 32, TOE OUT, provided in the left half of the second grid of markings 32, and TOE IN, provided in the right half of the second grid of markings 32. These indications make the use of the go kart set up tool more convenient for the user, as they help in interpreting the measurement readings.

An exemplary measurement of the camber and the toe in/toe out parameters of the steering mechanism is described with respect to FIG. 5C. A first go kart set up tool, such as the one shown in FIG. 1, is placed onto the right front stub axle of the go kart, with the laser emitter 10 pointing towards the left front wheel of the go kart. Analogously, a second go kart set up tool, such as the one shown in FIG. 1, is placed on the left front stub axle of the go kart, with the laser emitter 10 pointing towards the right front wheel of the go kart.

As the steering mechanism may have a positive or negative camber, the two go kart set up tools may be inclined with respect to an imaginary center line between the two axles. In other words, due to the camber of the steering mechanism, the two go kart set up tools may be inclined with respect to a transverse direction of the go kart, i.e. they may be placed with the upper portion of the go kart set up tools being inclined towards the right or left with respect to the lower portions. However, the level is used to vertically align the go kart set up tools in the front/rear direction of the go kart. In other words, when placed on the respective front stub axle with the V-groove being in elongated engagement with the respective front stub axle, the go kart set up tool in question is aligned in such a way that it extends straight up from the respective front stub axle and that it is not rotated downwards around the respective front stub axle. This alignment is referred to as a vertical alignment of the go kart set up tool in one dimension. In addition, the steering mechanism is brought into a straight position, i.e. the steering mechanism is not turned towards the right or left for the measurement.

With this set up, the laser beam of the laser emitter 10 of the first go kart set up tool impinges on the second target surface 30 of the second go kart set up tool, while the laser beam of the laser emitter 10 of the second go kart set up tool impinges on the second target surface 30 of the first go kart set up tool. The impingement point of the laser beam, stemming from the first go kart set up tool, placed on the right front stub axle, on the target surface 30 of the second go kart set up tool, placed on the left front stub axle, indicates the camber and the toe in or toe out of the right front wheel, i.e. of the right portion of the front steering mechanism. Analogously, the impingement point of the laser beam, stemming from the second go kart set up tool, placed on the left front axle, and impinging of the second target surface 30 of the first go kart set up tool, placed on the right front axle, indicates the camber and the toe in or toe out of the left front wheel, i.e. of the left portion of the steering mechanism. In other words, the camber and toe in/toe out parameters of one of the front stub axles can be made visual on a target surface attached to the other one of the two front stub axles.

Another second target surface 30′ is shown in FIG. 5D. The second target surface 30′ is almost identical to the first target surface 30 of FIG. 5C. The second grid of markings 32′ of the second target surface 30′ is identical to the second grid of markings 32 of the first target surface 30. The first and second caster scales 34′ and 36′ are identical to the first and second caster scales 34 and 36, but their positions on the left and the right of the second target surface are interchanged. The indication FRONT is provided with an arrow pointing into the opposite direction, as compared to FIG. 5C. In this way, it is indicated that the second target surface 30′ is primarily intended to be used on the left front stub axle. However, it is possible to use the second target surface 30′ on the right front stub axle as well.

An exemplary caster angle measurement is now described with respect to FIG. 5D. In addition to the elements discussed above, FIG. 5D depicts a line 38, which line 38 illustrates the travelling of an impinging laser beam during a caster scale measurement, the details of which will be described below.

The set up for the caster angle measurement is the same set up as for the camber and toe in/toe out measurement, described with respect to FIG. 5C. After the camber and toe in/toe out measurement, the locking of the steering mechanism in its straight position is released. After being unlocked, the steering wheel is turned from left to right or from right to left. This turning of the steering mechanism results in the laser beam from the go kart set up tool, placed on the left front stub axle, travelling across the second target surface 30 of the go kart set up tool, placed on the right front stub axle. Analogously, the turning of the steering mechanism results in the laser beam from the first go kart set up tool, placed on the right front stub axle, travelling across the second target surface 30 of the first go kart set up tool, placed on the left front stub axle.

FIG. 5D illustrates the travelling of the impinging laser beam across the exemplary second target surface 30′ for an exemplary caster angle measurement via the line 38. The line 38 crosses the first caster scale 34′ at value 63 and crosses the second caster scale 36′ at value 50. Those two values can be observed by the user of the go kart set up tool during the caster angle measurement. Further, by calculating the difference between these values, which amounts to 13, the user obtains an indication of the caster angle of the front stub axle, to which the go kart set up tool is attached. In other words, when observing the impinging laser beam on a particular go kart set up tool, attached to a particular front stub axle, the user is able to deduce an indication of the caster angle of exactly that front stub axle.

In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 5D, the first caster scale 34′ and the second caster scale 36′ have such a scaling that the difference between the two measured values directly corresponds to the caster angle of the stub axle in question. In the present example, the caster scale of the measured stub axle is 13°.

It is pointed out that the linear scaling of the first caster scale 34′ and the second caster scale 36′ is an approximation of the actual angular values. The actual values can be calculated via a tan-function. However, as common caster angles are fairly small, usually between 5° and 20°, in particular between 10° and 15°, and as the tan-function may be approximated well for small angles, the linear scaling provides sufficient accuracy for reaching a caster angle measurement that is sufficient for setting up the go kart steering mechanism.

It is further pointed out that the camber and toe in/toe out also have a slight influence on the caster angle measurement. For this reason, the caster angle measurement methodology, described with respect to FIG. 5D, yields a so-called compound caster measurement. However, as this is the measure commonly used for setting up the go kart and as this value is a fairly good measure for the driving characteristics, these slight influences and the measuring of the compound caster angle are acceptable.

Turning back to FIG. 5B, the measurement of the king pin angle is now described. The principle of the king pin angle measurement is the same as the principle of the caster angle measurement described above with respect to FIG. 5D. In an exemplary king pin angle measurement, the first target surface 20′ of FIG. 5D, e.g. as part of a go kart set up tool, is placed on the rear axle of the go kart, in particular onto a portion on the left side of the rear axle of the go kart. A go kart set up tool, such as the one shown in FIG. 1, is placed on the left front stub axle, with the laser emitter emitting a laser beam towards the rear of the go kart. The steering of the go kart is then turned from left to right or from right to left. As a result of this steering operation, the laser beam travels across the first target surface 20′, depicted in FIG. 5B. The travelling of the laser beam is illustrated by line 28. Due to the king pin angle of the left king pin of the steering mechanism of the go kart, the line 28 is not horizontal. In the depicted example, the laser beam crosses the first king pin angle scale 24′ at a value of 28 and crosses the second king pin angle scale 26′ at a value of 18. The difference between the two values, i.e. the value of 10, is an indication of the king pin angle of the left king pin. In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 5B, the difference represents the king pin angle in degrees, i.e. the king pin angle measured on the basis of the exemplary reading is 10°. Again, the linear scaling of the first and second king pin angle scales 24′, 26′ is an approximation and exemplary in nature. It is also possible to provide other scalings.

The interchanging of the first and second king pin angle scales between the first target surface 20, depicted in FIG. 5A and intended for use on the right side of the rear axle of the go kart, and the first target surface 20′, depicted in FIG. 5B and intended for use on the left side of the rear axle of the go kart, is for convenience of use. With this interchanging, the user may calculate the king pin angle in the same manner by subtracting the value measured at the “B” scale from the value measured at the “A” scale and yields positive/negative difference values for king pin inclinations towards the inside/outside of the go kart in the same manner for both sides. However, it is also possible to use on type of first target surface on both sides, as the scaling of and the distance between the first and second king pin scales is the same.

A set of two go kart set up tools in accordance with above described embodiments allows for very convenient checking of the longitudinal chassis alignment and gauging of the steering mechanism of the go kart. For example, a first go kart set up tool 2, such as the one depicted in FIG. 2A, may be equipped with the first target surface 20 of FIG. 5A, e.g. in the form of a sticker, and with the second target surface 30′ of FIG. 5D, e.g. also in the form of a sticker. This first go kart set up tool may conveniently be used on the right side of the rear axle and on the left front stub axle, with all the given labelling helping the user during the measurements. Further, a second go kart set up tool 2, such as the one depicted in FIG. 2A, may be equipped with the first target surface 20′ of FIG. 5B, e.g. in the form of a sticker, and with the second target surface 30 of FIG. 5C, e.g. also in the form of a sticker. This second go kart set up tool may conveniently be used on the left side of the rear axle and on the right front stub axle, with all the given labelling helping the user during the measurements. In this way, the first and second go kart set up tools may be used as pairs, with the two being placed on the two front stub axles or with one being placed on a front axle and the other being placed on a corresponding side of the rear axle of the go kart, and all the measurements described above may be carried out with the two go kart set up tools only.

While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A go kart set up tool for checking a longitudinal chassis alignment of a go kart and for gauging a steering mechanism of the go kart having a first front stub axle and a second front stub axle on opposing sides of the go kart and having a rear axle, the go kart set up tool comprising: a tool body; a level disposed in the tool body for vertically aligning the tool body in at least one dimension; a laser emitter disposed within the tool body and adapted to emit a laser beam in a laser emission direction, with the laser emitter being aimable at a first target for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart and being aimable at a second target for gauging the steering mechanism; and an axle engagement structure, wherein the axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on any one of the first and second front stub axles in two orientations, with the laser emitter aiming towards a rear of the go kart in a first orientation of the tool body for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment and with the laser emitter aiming towards the other one of the first and second front stub axles in a second orientation of the tool body for gauging the steering mechanism; or wherein the axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on the rear axle in a first orientation, with the laser emitter aiming towards a front of the go kart in the first orientation of the tool body for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment, and wherein the axle engagement structure allows for the tool body to be positioned on any one of the first and second front stub axles in a second orientation, with the laser emitter aiming towards the other one of the first and second front stub axles in the second orientation of the tool body for gauging the steering mechanism.
 2. The go kart set up tool according to claim 1, wherein the laser emission direction in the first orientation is rotated 90° with respect to the laser emission direction in the second orientation.
 3. The go kart set up tool according to claim 1, wherein the axle engagement structure has a first engagement element and a second engagement element, with the tool body having the first orientation, when the first engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles or when the first engagement element is in engagement with the rear axle, and with the tool body having the second orientation, when the second engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles.
 4. The go kart set up tool according to claim 3, wherein the first and second engagement elements cross.
 5. The go kart set up tool according to claim 3, wherein the first engagement element is substantially perpendicular to the laser emission direction and/or wherein the second engagement element is substantially parallel to the laser emission direction.
 6. The go kart set up tool according to claim 3, wherein the axle engagement structure is integral with the tool body, with the entire go kart set up tool having the first orientation, when the first engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles or when the first engagement element is in engagement with the rear axle, and with the entire go kart set up tool having the second orientation, when the second engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles.
 7. The go kart set up tool according to claim 3, wherein the first and second engagement elements are a first tubular channel and a second tubular channel.
 8. The go kart set up tool according to claim 3, wherein the first and second engagement elements are a first engagement groove and second engagement groove.
 9. The go kart set up tool according to claim 8, wherein the first and second engagement grooves are V-shaped grooves.
 10. The go kart set up tool according to claim 8, wherein the first and second engagement grooves cross.
 11. The go kart set up tool according to claim 8, wherein the first engagement groove is substantially perpendicular to the laser emission direction and/or wherein the second engagement groove is substantially parallel to the laser emission direction.
 12. The go kart set up tool according to claim 8, wherein the axle engagement structure is integral with the tool body, with the entire go kart set up tool having the first orientation, when the first engagement groove is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles or when the first engagement groove is in engagement with the rear axle, and with the entire go kart set up tool having the second orientation, when the second engagement groove is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles.
 13. The go kart set up tool according to claim 1, wherein the axle engagement structure has exactly one engagement element and wherein the axle engagement structure is separable from the tool body and attachable to the tool body in a first attachment configuration and in a second attachment configuration, with the tool body having the first orientation, when the axle engagement structure is attached to the tool body in the first attachment configuration and the one engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles or when the axle engagement structure is attached to the tool body in the first attachment configuration and the one engagement element is in engagement with the rear axle, and with the tool body having the second orientation, when the axle engagement structure is attached to the tool body in the second attachment configuration and the one engagement element is in engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles.
 14. The go kart set up tool according to claim 13, wherein the axle engagement structure is magnetically attachable to the tool body.
 15. The go kart set up tool according to claim 1, wherein the tool body and/or the axle engagement structure comprise(s) a magnet, such that the go kart set up tool can be brought into magnetic engagement with the one of the first and second front stub axles and/or such that the go kart set up tool can be brought into magnetic engagement with the rear axle.
 16. The Go kart set up tool according to claim 1, wherein the tool body comprises a first target surface for making an impinging laser beam visible to a user, with the first target surface having a first grid of markings, such that the go kart set up tool is usable as the first target for checking the longitudinal chassis alignment of the go kart.
 17. The go kart set up tool according to claim 16, wherein the tool body comprises a second target surface for making an impinging laser beam visible to a user, with the second target surface having a second grid of markings, such that the go kart set up tool is usable as the second target for gauging the steering mechanism of the go kart.
 18. The go kart set up tool according to claim 1, wherein the tool body comprises a second target surface for making an impinging laser beam visible to a user, with the second target surface having a second grid of markings, such that the go kart set up tool is usable as the second target for gauging the steering mechanism of the go kart.
 19. The go kart set up tool according to claim 1, wherein the tool body has a target surface for making an impinging laser beam from a separate laser emission tool visible to a user of the go kart set up tool, wherein the target surface comprises a first scale, comprising a plurality of first markings, and a second scale, comprising a plurality of second markings, with the first scale and the second scale having the same scaling, and wherein the first scale and the second scale are spaced apart, such that, upon the separate laser emission tool being attached to the front wheel steering mechanism and the front wheel steering mechanism being turned and the impinging laser beam moving across the target surface as a result thereof, a first measurement on the first scale and a second measurement on the second scale can be made by visual inspection, with a difference between the first measurement and the second measurement being an indication of the caster angle or of the king pin angle of a steerable stub axle of the go kart.
 20. A set of a plurality of go kart set up tools, comprising: a first go kart set up tool in accordance with claim 17; and a second go kart set up tool in accordance with claim 17, wherein, in operation, at least one of checking the longitudinal alignment of the go kart and gauging the steering mechanism of the go kart can be carried out with the first and second go kart set up tools only. 